beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.05.02 2017가합100504 (1)

파면처분무효확인의 소 등

Text

1. The Defendant’s removal against the Plaintiff on May 18, 2016 confirms that the removal is null and void.

2. The Defendant on January 2, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a school juristic person established on January 30, 1964 for the purpose of conducting higher education to train secondary education and middle-aged workers.

B. From September 1, 1996, the Plaintiff was an associate professor at C University established and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant University”).

C. On April 7, 2016, the Defendant demanded the Defendant’s teachers’ disciplinary committee to decide on a disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, and sent an explanatory note stating the grounds for the disciplinary action to the Plaintiff.

On May 9, 2016, the teachers' disciplinary committee decided on disciplinary action against the plaintiff and notified the defendant.

On May 18, 2016, the Defendant took disciplinary action against the Plaintiff for removal (hereinafter “instant removal”) and did not pay benefits after the date of the removal.

The grounds for the disciplinary action are as follows:

(A) On September 1, 1996, the Plaintiff is a tourism service and a member of the faculty, who was appointed to be former teachers on September 1, 1996, and was in charge of the business activities, such as the selection of a company, the selection of purchasing goods, and the settlement of accounts in various projects, such as the improvement of educational environment. Since July 2015, the Plaintiff served as the head of the Industry-Academic Cooperation Department and the head of the group. D: (i) the Plaintiff’s first father as his first father from 2009 to 2015, the Plaintiff was working as a concurrent and part-time lecturer in the Plaintiff’s department and supplied liquor to the school. (ii) The Plaintiff was a third father of the Plaintiff, who was admitted to the department of tourist information and the Plaintiff was in violation of the duty to purchase and manage goods, and was in violation of the duty to purchase and sell goods to the school on February 2015.

A. F related to F (occupational breach of trust, fabrication of private documents, uttering of an investigation document, embezzlement) ① F, the ancillary of the Plaintiff, made the business operator “G” on January 12, 2015.