However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a commercial sex trafficking business establishment under the trade name of “E” in the ground of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building.

The Defendant established three marina rooms and five sugars installed in the above business establishment in disguised manner, employed F to guide customers and to provide hearts, and employed G, H, I, and J as female employees, on condition that the Defendant would pay KRW 6-80,000,000, out of the 120,000,000 per customer.

1. On March 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 120,000 won from a male guest who found the above business establishment from the price for sexual traffic; (b) directed him/her as the price for sexual traffic; and (c) directed him/her as the price for sexual traffic; and (d) provided the above J and the first sexual intercourse.

2. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 120,000 won from a male guest who found the above business establishment from the price for sexual traffic; (b) directed him/her as the price for sexual traffic; and (c) directed him/her as the price for sexual intercourse with the above G.

3. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 120,00 from K to the price for sexual traffic at KRW 120,00 as the price for sexual traffic; (b) provided guidance to the above G to the sugar; and (c) provided that the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with the said G.

4. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 120,000 won from the customer L who found the above business establishment from the customer L to receive 120,000 won as the price for sexual traffic; and (b) instructed the above H to perform sexual intercourse once.

5. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant received 120,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from customers M who found the above business establishment on March 20, 2015, and provided guidance to the above I and once sexual intercourse.

The Defendant, as well as the Defendant, assisted sexual traffic by the aforementioned method from February 2, 2015 to March 22, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of J, I, H, G, M, or L;

1. The police statement of K;

1. Application of statutes governing field enforcement photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, including relevant Articles of law and punishment;