However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) had a time to take place the number plate of the vehicle owned by the Defendant, and (b) had been left alone in the said carhouse for the reason that the vehicle needs to continue to exist in the vehicle to the Go-gu deaf at which the Defendant was in possession of the Defendant at the time; (c) had the registration number plate removed from the front of the vehicle; and (d) operated the said sealed vehicle on the front of the vehicle; and (e) operated the said sealed vehicle on the road of the front day of the bathing class at the time of passage, from that time until December 13, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant used a registration number plate under the Automobile Management Act in a fraudulent manner and exercised a motor vehicle registration number plate for the purpose of exercising it at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on internal investigation (verification of the owner of the column), report on internal investigation (Attachment of a photograph of the vehicle in E Cocoon), investigation report (Attachment of D or E register of automobiles);

1. Application of statutes on motor vehicle registration certificates;

1. Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the relevant Act, Article 71 (1) of the Automobile Management Act (Unlawful Use of Registration Number Plate), Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (Unlawful Use of Air Code), and Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor (the crime of unlawful use air defense shall be limited to imprisonment with prison labor) with respect to a crime of violation of the Automobile Management Act selected under Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the crime of unlawful use air defense shall be punished under the provisions of Articles 40 and 50 of the Automobile Management Act, and the

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, the period during which the defendant used the air illegally used, and the circumstances leading to the crime of this case.