In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50 million won.

Defendant

B On September 19, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 27th of the same month.

The Defendants knew that there was no suspicion on the case that the victim F was accused of the case that the victim F was accused of to the Gangseo branch office, and attempted to acquire the money from the victim by deceptiveizing it.

On April 10, 2010, the Defendants stated that “In the office of H Co., Ltd. in the operation of the Defendant A, which is located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si G Building 201, the Defendant “A is the representative of the Party B, who is the representative of the Party B, who is the representative of the Party B, who has a minor influence in Cheongcheon-gu, and has a minor influence in Cheongcheon-gu. In order for the Party’s accusation case to be directly investigated at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, five million won is required in terms of expenses.” The Defendant B stated that “I would make the victim be able to directly investigate the case of the Party’s accusation by the party through the party’s and the party’s visitors, and I will be able to enter the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office.”

However, even if the Defendants received money from the victim as a solicitation of the above accusation case, they did not have the intention or ability to make the victim directly investigate the above accusation case in the Supreme Prosecutors' Office through the party who had access to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office through the party who had access to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office.

In collusion, the Defendants received KRW 2 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account I in the name of the Defendant A and received money from the victim on April 12, 2010 and received money from the victim on the pretext of solicitation about the cases handled by the public official at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Statement of witness F in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Each investigation report (report on hearing statements in K, L, and M telephone);

1. Investigation report (the report accompanied by the withdrawn mail sent data);

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: The summary information inquiry of the case law.