The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

Therefore, in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the Defendants, the argument of unfair sentencing that the lower court infringed on the essential contents of the principle of balanced criminal punishment or the principle of responsibility cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.