The facts of the cause of the claim (However, the "creditor" is "the plaintiff," and the "debtor" is "the defendant," respectively) are either not disputed between the parties, or can be acknowledged by considering the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 through 10, and there is no reflective evidence.

At the time of joining each of the instant fraternitys, the Defendant agreed to settle the accounts in a way that only the principal of the fraternity is returned to the Plaintiff in the event that some of the fraternitys are in default of the payment of the fraternitys at the time of joining each of the instant fraternitys, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that each of the said fraternitys was broken in the middle.

If so, the plaintiff's claim for the fraternity and loan of this case is reasonable (the delivery date of the original payment order - November 16, 2016). It is so decided as per Disposition by citing the above.