beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.02.05 2015가단520957

건물명도

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real property listed in the separate sheet, each point is indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

Reasons

1. According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 6, and 7, there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim, or according to the purport of the whole pleadings, on May 31, 2010, the court below concluded a real estate lease agreement with the plaintiff as to the lease deposit amount of 3,00,000 won, monthly rent, and 2,50,000 won until May 31, 2012, with the remainder of 30,000 won after deducting the lease deposit amount from the lease deposit amount as of December 31, 2015, the defendant notified the plaintiff of the unpaid portion of the lease deposit and the remainder of the lease deposit as of December 31, 201, and the fact that the defendant sent it to the plaintiff with the remainder of 10,350,000 won until December 31, 2015.

2. The defendant's assertion and the judgment as to the unpaid monthly rent are asserting that there is a dispute over the unpaid monthly rent, but the defendant's above assertion is rejected as it does not present specific arguments other than the above assertion and does not present any evidence.

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.