If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 21:30 on June 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by force, such as, “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in the Gyeonggi-si, Si, Si, Si, Gunpo-si; (b) the Defendant: (c) interfered with the victim’s restaurant operation by force, such as: (a) the Defendant, by drinking the victim “D” restaurant on the ground that the victim does not walk well; (d) the victim does not walk well; (e) why he does not walk well; and (e) why he does so; and (e) how he does so; and (e) how he does so; and (e) how he does so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including photographs, etc. attached thereto);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;