However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant: (a) around October 15, 201, at the “D” clothes shop operated by the Defendant’s son located in Hepo-si C; and (b) the victim B provided that “If the Defendant borrowed 10,000,000 won to the victim B, she would have paid 30,000 won as interest per month and the principal would have repaid the time limit money.”

However, even if we borrow money, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained the victim's clothes above the same day from the victim in cash, and acquired the victim's 10 million won.

2. On February 20, 2012, the Defendant provided that “The victim B shall pay an extension fee without a framework” to the victim E located in Fagpo-si C.

However, even if the time limit money is provided, there is no intention or ability to pay the time limit money until the end of the time limit.

Accordingly, the victim began on March 20, 2012 and paid a map of KRW 1.4 million at a time before receiving the time limit amounting to KRW 20 million,00,000,000 at one time, and after receiving one time, the defendant joined two and five times for the operation of the victim, which is operated by paying KRW 1.6 million at one time. On April 20, 2012, the defendant was deducted from the above clothes shop from the sum of money and delivered KRW 15,60,000 in cash for the time limit, after deducting the cash of KRW 5,00,000 in cash from the sum of money to the defendant on July 20, 2012. However, the defendant did not pay the remainder of KRW 1,60,000 in cash from the cash account account account transfer to the defendant on the basis of the time limit amount to KRW 1,60,000,000.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the victim, thereby deceiving 30.6 million won in total.

3. The Defendant stated, around August 15, 2012, that “the victim B shall pay an extension fee without a framework,” to the victim E located in Shapo-si C.

However, even if the time limit money is provided, there is no intention or ability to pay the time limit money until the end of the time limit.

In this regard, the victim on September 15, 2012.