Highest 871, 2013

1. On May 6, 2013, the Defendant driven a Cco-ray car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.237% at the section of about 500 meters from May 6, 2013 to the front road of the salary class in the same city, which is located in the daily upper road of Chuncheon-si knowledge, around 22:50 on May 6, 2013.

2. On May 16, 2013, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.138% in the section of approximately 500 meters from May 16, 2013 to the front road of the same city-based restaurant with a mutual influorial knowledge-based 1, Chuncheon-si knowledge-based 1, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.138% from May 16, 2013.

On October 31, 2013, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license, driven a car with approximately 500 meters section from a master's master's zone parking lot in the Chuncheon-si, Chuncheon-si to the front line of the horse in the same Dong from a master's zone parking lot in the Chuncheon-si, Chuncheon-si to the front line of the horse in the same Dong.

Summary of Evidence

Highest 871, 2013

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Making inquiries into the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on license ledger;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2(2)1, 44(1) (the point of blood alcohol concentration 0.237% and the point of drinking alcohol), Articles 148-2(2)2, and 44(1) (the point of blood alcohol concentration 0.138% and the point of drinking alcohol level) of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraphs 1 and 43 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 152(1) and 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving without a license) of the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration the various circumstances shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the fact that the crimes are repeated among concurrent crimes, such as the first sentence of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act not less than four times prior crimes of the same kind, and the same crimes among those being investigated and tried for the same