A. The Defendant seized each of the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet No. 4, No. 504, 503, on the basis of the authentic copy of the notarial deed set forth in paragraph 1 of the order against C.

B. The plaintiff is a mother of C, and the above A.

C is living together with C at the domicile described in the subsection.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument

2. In full view of each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 2-1, 2, 3-1 through 4, Gap evidence Nos. 4, and Gap evidence Nos. 5-1 through 5, the plaintiff can be found to have purchased each of the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet. Thus, it is reasonable to view each of the above corporeal movables as owned by the plaintiff.

Therefore, the above compulsory execution should not be permitted for the property owned by the plaintiff, which is a third party.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.