However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

1. Defendant A was a person who was a spouse after filing a marriage report with C on October 29, 1987. A around November 17, 2008, Defendant D’E within the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City’s “E” telecom, B and once sexual intercourses, around December 11, 2008, Defendant A and her sexual intercourses with the above B and once.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above Defendant B, the date, time, place, etc. described in each of the above paragraph (1), and sexual intercourses with A twice as mentioned above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) is the first offender in the case of the defendant A