However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the conclusion of this judgment.

1. On May 17, 2016, the Defendant injured the victim C, on May 17, 2016, indicated in the indictment that the victim C (7 years old) and the victim who satisf attached to the Defendant’s satisfe in the Mana-gu Man-gu Man-si, Annan-si, Annan-si, Annan-si (7 years old) around 17:00 stated that “the Defendant was injured by the Defendant’s satisfeing the victim’s satch, etc. out of the main satf, etc., and the Defendant got back from the main satf,” but according to the evidence examined later, the Defendant and the victim seem to have carried out the satfe of the main satf, sating the victim’s satf, sating the victim’s satch from the out of the main satf, and broken the face and drinking.

However, the defendant argued that the victim was unable to maintain balance and go beyond the stairs, and that he was only injured by the victim's body, and that there was no reason to drink. At the time, the witness considered that the defendant and the victim did breath, or was in the same way in the stairs.

statement and the defendant did not see that he was drinking the victim.

In light of the fact that the statement is made, it is difficult to believe the victim's statement as it is). This part of the facts charged is deemed to have no substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense, even if it is recognized differently as to the circumstances of the injury.

The victim suffered bodily injury such as salt, tension, etc. in the cryp of the cryp that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. Around July 19, 2017, the Defendant injured the Victim F, while drinking alcohol with the Victim F (64 years of age) within the said E F, inflicted an injury on the Victim F, such as cutting the body of the victim’s face for about three weeks, when drinking alcohol and drinking the victim’s face.

(i) the evidence;