When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

C On January 4, 2015, at around 09:20, assaulted F's face at least 2-3 times on the front side of E in Pakistan.

On January 4, 2015, in the case of the above assault case, in order for a slope H, who was dispatched to the site after the receipt of 112 report, to arrest C as a flagrant offender at around 09:35 on January 4, 2015, the Defendant committed an act, i.e., hinging C to prevent the above H from driving, by stating that “When there is no fact that there is no evidence of why you want to kn't kn't?? kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn's face by hand when the above H would be kn't kn't kn's face by hand.

As a result, the defendant jointly with C interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.