A. On January 21, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) as the Gwangju District Court 2016TT District Court Decision 2016T; (b) the third obligor Company A; (c) the claim amount: (d) KRW 71,219,783, such as the principal and interest of the claim based on the judgment of the Gwangju District Court 2013Dadan4543; and (e) the attached claim amount: (c) one-half of the amount calculated by subtracting the tax and public charges from the monthly payment of the claim; and (d) the end allowances received by C from June and December of each year; and (e) until such amount reaches the above claim (if the amount falls under the amount prescribed by the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Execution Act in consideration of the minimum cost of living under the National Basic Living Security Act; and (e) the amount obtained by deducting the amount determined by the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Execution Act in consideration of the cost of living of the standard household; and (e) the remaining amount of the claim was determined by the Defendant by 1/25 of the collection order.

B. On July 25, 2017, Seoul Rehabilitation Court Decision 2017 Gohap1011 decided on July 25, 2017, A was decided to commence rehabilitation procedures, and it was decided to obtain the rehabilitation plan approval on January 30, 2018.

The defendant was considered as a custodian in the above rehabilitation procedure.

C. B (the same person as the Defendant is; hereinafter referred to as “B”) and C, on February 24, 2011, a notary public drafted a notarial deed by No. 264 of the 21st century’s General Law Office No. 2011.

The above notarial deed is issued by C at the face value of KRW 76,00,000 for the payee B, and on February 23, 2014 for the due date. If the payment of the above notarial deed is delayed to the holder of the above notarial deed, an objection is raised even if it is enforced immediately.