beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.05.10 2017나58219

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding or adding as follows. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The river maintenance work was conducted on the surface 10 of the judgment of the first instance court which added or changed the part; and

In addition, "No. 369 square meters and no. 65 square meters prior to F. 215 square meters" are added to "the fact that no separate cadastral survey has been conducted from 1994 to 2014" in Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the result of Q's appraisal" in Part 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and "the result of this court's inquiry reply to the Kim Jong-hwan of the Korea National Land Information Corporation" is added.

3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the conjunctive claim is accepted as reasonable. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.