2. The judgment of the court below takes into account the following factors: (a) the defendant repents the error; (b) the defendant agreed with the victims; and (c) the defendant has a dependent on the defendant; (d) the defendant again commits the crime of this case during the suspension of execution due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act; (c) the violation of the Road Traffic Act; (d) the violation of the Road Traffic Act; (e) the violation of the Road Traffic Act; and (e) the defendant's blood content is considerably high; and (e) other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment; and (e)

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is apparent that the decision of the court below was omitted from "1. Selection of punishment and each imprisonment decision" after the third letter of the decision of the court below, it shall be corrected to add it ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.