도시공원및녹지등에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. It appears to the purport of misconception of facts that an unequal administrative disposition was issued without clarifying the gist of the grounds for appeal.
2. We find it difficult to accept the Defendant’s assertion of erroneous determination of facts in light of the following: (a) the Defendant was convicted of having installed structures on a green belt without obtaining permission from the competent authorities in the past; and (b) the Defendant installed containers without permission from the competent authorities despite being aware that the land in this case was a buffer green belt area.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.