1. On April 8, 2016, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 21:10, the victim D (at the age of 50) located in C, who was under the influence of alcohol; (b) the victim was under the influence of alcohol; (c) but (d) the victim was under the influence of alcohol on the ground that “the victim was dnicking so that he had a large amount of alcohol, so he was dnicking; and (d) the victim was under the influence of alcohol, and (e) the victim was dnicking for the reason that he was aware of alcohol.” (c) The Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “Ye Y Y Y Y Y Y, I

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim to be in excess of KRW 70,000.

2. Obstruction of the performance of official duties, injury Defendant received a request from the police officer G (son, 27 years old) belonging to the police officer G of the police station in Pakistan who was called upon receiving a report to the effect that the act of disturbance was done as above, and the above police officer expressed the desire to confirm his identity “I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I

As a result, the Defendant interfered with G's performance of official duties due to violence, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on G such as an unexplosion in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Written investigation of injury to the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the suspension period of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor due to interference with auction, while serving a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

The method and contents of each crime are very bad.