beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.30 2013고정2556

모욕

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, Defendant A is a legal couple relationship, a person who operates a boomed rice, and a salted fish store in the Na City D market, and the victim E (the age of 49) is a person who operates fishery products store in the D market.

1. Defendant A

A. At around 06:30 on August 16, 2013, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by openly insulting the victim to the victim on the page where there are 5-6 market merchants, such as G, without any reason, the Defendant found the victim in the D market operated by the victim.

B. On August 26, 2013, around 16:20 on August 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) made a public insult of the victim by openly insulting the victim by referring the victim to the market-merchants, such as H, and 30 customers on the job where there are 30 customers, without any justifiable reason.

C. On September 11, 2013, around 14:15, the Defendant: (a) found the Fund operated by the victim in the D market in Naju City; and (b) made a public insult of the victim’s victim with the victim’s “low-age mentally ill persons; (c) Hashed the victim at the place where there are 30 customers, including H, and without any reason, she read the victim as “low-age mentally ill persons.”

2. On September 11, 2013, Defendant B made a public insultd the victim by having the victim “a two-year old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-noting-noting-noting-noting-up-up-up-

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G, H and I;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel’s arguments regarding the 112 Report Processing Manual, the recording file of the reported situation, the CD, the recording file recording record, and the defense counsel’s argument.