2. Determination is a favorable condition for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant recognized the crime of late and reflects both; and (b) suffering from mental illness.

However, in full view of various circumstances, including the fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime for which more than three times have passed since punishment was imposed on the part of the crime obstructing the performance of official duties, such as serving three times of punishment, and the fact that no agreement has been made with the victim, and there is no special change in circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment was rendered, the equity in sentencing with the same similar case, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, we do not accept the above argument of the defendant's above sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.