beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.09.11 2015노742

상해등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (five months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed all of the instant crimes and committed a mistake.

In addition, the degree of injury of the victimO of this case is insignificant and the degree of exercising force against the defendant's victimized police officers is not much serious.

In addition, it seems that the defendant committed any crime of this case in a state of drunk influence at the time. After being sentenced to a punishment for larceny in 2002 before the crime of this case was committed, the crime of this case is not committed, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period exceeding the suspension of execution after being sentenced to imprisonment for a period of six months for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. The crime of this case is in concurrent crimes between the judgment finalized on October 29, 2014 and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, it is reasonable to consider the equity with the case where the defendant was tried, and the most important fact that the defendant must support his wife is the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed on the ground that the defendant did not take the demand for the refund of the defendant at the marina office and caused workers E to be faced with the above victim's head, causing the above victim to suffer bodily injury, such as double gambling, etc. which requires approximately one week medical treatment, and demanding the victim's police officer who was called upon the defendant's 112 report to commit suicide to get off the vehicle, and the police officer was refused to demand the above police officer who was called upon the defendant's 112 report, while taking a bath to the above police officer, taking the above police officer's body several times by hand to arrest the defendant in the act of committing a crime, and the police officer seems to have been able to take a bath to the above police officer, and the crime of this case was committed more serious.

Furthermore, the Defendant committed the obstruction of performance of official duties before committing the instant crime.