부당이득금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
The reasoning of the court's reasoning on this case is as follows: (a) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B large 123 square meters was divided from July 15, 1978; (b) the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B large 123 square meters changed from the administrative district on January 1, 198; and (c) the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B large 123 square meters changed from the land category on August 31, 1998." (hereinafter "the road of this case"). (b) the judgment of the second part of the second part of the judgment, "No objection or demand for compensation was raised against the use of the road of this case for a long time; (d) among the land constructed as a road included in the urban development plan of this case, the procedure for consultation acquisition or expropriation was not taken with respect to the land of this case; and (e) the use of the road of this case was also reversed by adding the right to benefit of this case to the road of this case."
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.