However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. No one shall illegally occupy or use agricultural production infrastructure without any justifiable ground prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as cases where an emergency measure is required for the prevention of damage caused by a natural disaster or for lifesaving, etc.;

Nevertheless, from July 2010 to October 20, 2015, the Defendant illegally occupied the land 2,626 square meters owned by the Korea Rural Community Corporation in D or E, an agricultural production infrastructure, and used it as an orchard.

2. On January 23, 2013, the injured Defendant: (a) around 16:00 permanent residence G, a victim G (in the 55-year-old orchard, the Defendant found the subject of alcohol on the ground that the ordinary child victim does not feel a good sound, and (b) brought the victim’s desire to be a victim on the bridge on the bridge, fall on the floor of the bridge, and caused the victim to fall on the floor, thereby requiring a two-month medical treatment.

3. Around January 19, 2015, the Defendant filed a request for a subsidy with the permanent mayor via the Agricultural Cooperative of Daegu-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, via the details of the completion of the project and the details of the claim for a subsidy regarding the “the primary project for the modernization of high quality facilities of fruit trees [the death department] H6 (general penalty).”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not develop and complete new tolerances in the Defendant’s possession company and orchard in the permanent residence, but installed only the magr, flow meters, and electric facilities in the existing government, and transferred 4 million won to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of HJ, the contractor, and then submitted the statement of passbook transaction as if the Defendant returned 1.5 million won out of 1.5 million won to the Defendant’s wife L account on the day of permanent residence and paid 4 million won for the Defendant’s own shares on the day of permanent residence, and there was no intention or ability to bear self-charges.

Defendant deceiving N, who is a person in charge of M at the time of permanent residence as above, and that deceivings the Defendant’s permanent residence from January 26, 2015 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (O) with the Defendant’s name.