However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 5, 2015, the Defendant purchased gasoline 9.537 liters for the purpose of preventing “F cafeteria” of the victim’s operation on the ground that the Defendant had already repaid one million won, i.e., borrowed from the victim D through E, and that the victim was punished by reporting the Defendant’s gambling, and the Defendant was punished, and then purchased one gater at the convenience store of the US saw 1-22 in sealed 1-22.

At around 10:25 on the same day, the Defendant prepared a fire prevention for the existing structure of the victim by spreading 2 liters of the gasoline on the restaurant bed, in the above restaurant located in G in the male and female city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, H, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the victim has agreed with; and

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;