폭행
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. On December 22, 2015, the Defendant used assault against the Victim B on the road prior to “△△△△△” located in the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si around 20:50 on December 22, 2015.
D(n, 17 years old) and E(n, 14 years old) and “Isnova, Ispan, Ispan, Isn, Ispan, Isn, Ispan, Ispan, Isn, Isn, Is
The victim B (64) who is the head of the store, stops the vehicle and string the strings in order to kill the above strings, and caused the victim to drop the strings of the strings that were loaded in the strings without any reason.
As the Defendant continued to resist the above Defendant’s behavior, the Defendant took a bath for the victim’s flag “a flag and Chewing flag”, and her hand took off the victim’s her mother by her hand, her flab, and her flab, and her fladdled the victim’s flab, and assaulted the victim’s flag by walking the flab on two occasions.
B. The Defendant, in relation to the victim F, committed assault against the victim F, at the time, place, and the victim F (48 years of age), who was the owner of “△△ Mart,” from the victim’s request for assistance, expressed the victim’s bath to “the victim,” who was the owner of “△△△ Mt,” was in control of the Defendant, and used the victim’s breath, thereby harming the victim’s breath, and booming the victim’s breath by hand, and assaulting the victim’s satch.
2. Each of the facts charged of the instant case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the records, the records of the instant case are as follows: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27551, Aug. 30, 2016; Presidential
9.1. The injured party F and B expressed their intention not to be punished against the defendant. Thus, all of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.