2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant's time to commit the instant crime and reflects the nature of the instant crime in light of the harm and harm inflicted on individuals, homes, and society, and the Defendant committed again the instant crime even though he had the record of having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime on 2008, taking into account the following factors: the Defendant's age, character and conduct, background and consequence leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the suspended sentence of imprisonment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.