On August 4, 2014, around 02:30 on August 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol, was aware of the disturbance at his house; (b) continued to take a secret number of the locking device; (c) was informed by E, a police officer, who was dispatched after receiving a report, received a check from the police officer, who was the police officer of the Changwon Police Station D police Station of the Changwon Police Station called, and was under the control of E on two occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. The act of assaulting a police officer called out after reporting the reason for sentencing under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Crimes is a serious criminal that denies the rule of law, and the degree of assault against a police officer of a defendant is not easy. In addition, considering all the factors such as the criminal records of the defendant, the criminal records of the defendant, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc., the punishment against the defendant shall be determined as per the order.