In light of the evidence adopted by the first instance court and the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of all of the charges of obstruction of performance of official duties, damage to property, violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.), obstruction of business, theft against AZ, on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, the argument that the court below erred by misunderstanding facts or misunderstanding legal principles as to embezzlement, victim Z, Z, AE, AF, AI, AJ, and AM, and each assault against the victim AM and AM, is not a legitimate ground for appeal since the defendant's ground for appeal or the court below did not consider it as the subject of ex officio.

Even if examined ex officio, there is no error as alleged in the judgment below.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.