2. It is recognized that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant did not operate the vehicle of this case for the purpose of committing a crime or committing other unlawful act.

However, in view of the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, motive, means and method of the instant crime, circumstances after committing the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is deemed unreasonable merely because it is too unreasonable, without the acquisition of so-called “vehicles” and without the registration of transfer of ownership, to drive the said vehicle, and the period of operation of the said vehicle is shorter than the period.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.