2. The judgment of this case is the case where the defendant conspired with D so that he can carry out the demolition work related to the redevelopment project in collusion with D, even though he did not have the right to implement the redevelopment project in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and he acquired KRW 100 million under the name of the contract deposit for the removal project. While the defendant is aged 71 years old and was in the trial, he is not able to pay damages differently from his accomplice D, the defendant introduced the name of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "C") as the chairperson, and was present at the scene of receiving KRW 100 million. The defendant did not appear to have been able to return the performance bond received from the victims such as M, N andO (hereinafter referred to as the "new island"), and the defendant's suspect examination of the case of this case to the extent that it is difficult to remove the defendant's new performance bond to the extent of 100 million, such as the defendant's motive to remove the defendant's new performance bond and the defendant's new performance bond to the extent of 1000 billion won.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.