공공단체등위탁선거에관한법률위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The spouse of a candidate who participates in an election of the head of an agricultural cooperative shall not make a contribution during the contribution-restricted period (from September 21, 2014 to March 11, 2015).
The Defendant, as the spouse of the candidate F who won an election for the head of the E Agricultural Cooperative Association, enforced on March 11, 2015, was willing to provide money and valuables to the members and appeal for support in order to have the F elected.
1. The Defendant, at around 10:30 on February 13, 2015, called “G” to the members G, and at around 11:00 on the same day, he met G at the entrance of the village near the G located in Haan-gun, Haan-gun, Haan-gun, G at around 11:00 on the same day, according to the evidence examined below, the Defendant was not a member G at the house of G, but at the entrance of G at the vicinity of the house of G, and it was recognized that the Defendant met G at the entrance near the house of G, and that there
G referred to as 'missect.' and 300,000 won in cash, the bags of money have been drawn up.
2. At around 08:30 on February 21, 2015, the Defendant sought the house of the J members of the J located in Newannam-gun I, Nanannam-gun, and then sought to J as follows: “I would like to find out any house which could not be held if the candidate’s registration was abandoned; I would like to request before the withdrawal. I would like to see that she would be tightly tightly unfolded for the people who want to know, and that she would be able to do so.” The Defendant put an envelope of money containing KRW 300,000 in cash into the house of the JJ.
3. On March 8, 2015, around 11:30 on March 8, 2015, the Defendant included a plastic bag containing KRW 300,000 in cash in L, at the Defendant’s house located in K located in Newannam-gun, the Defendant: (a) “Doctrine.” at the Defendant’s house located in K; and (b) “Doctrine..”
As a result, the defendant provided three voters with cash of KRW 900,000 during the contribution-restricted period as the spouse of the candidate.
Summary of Evidence
[Fact 1]
1. Legal statement of witness G;
1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant by the prosecution