상속채무금
1. The Plaintiff, within the scope of the property inherited from the network E, Defendant B, Defendant B, Defendant C, and D, respectively, on 27.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers) and arguments, the plaintiff paid 97,020,000 won to the deceased E (hereinafter "the deceased") on December 26, 2017 by December 28, 2017. The deceased did not cause the plaintiff to exchange, and on January 2, 2018, prepared a confirmation document stating that the plaintiff would pay the above 97,020,000 won to the plaintiff by January 16, 2018. The deceased died on January 4, 2018; the defendant Eul, as the deceased's wife, defendant C, and D, as the deceased's children, the Defendants were aware of the fact that they received a limited report on the deceased's property on March 28, 2018 (the Daejeon Family Court).
According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B succeeded to 3/7, Defendant C, and D respectively 2/7 property from the deceased, and Defendant B shall be paid damages for delay calculated annually from February 8, 2018 to the date following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the date of complete payment, to the extent of KRW 41,580,00 (=97,020,000 + KRW 41,579,861, Defendant C, and D, as claimed by the Plaintiff, within the extent of KRW 27,720,00 (=97,020,000 + 2/7) as sought by the Plaintiff, within the scope of the inherited property. The Defendants shall be liable to pay damages for delay calculated annually from February 8, 2018 to the date of complete payment, to the extent of inherited property.
Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.