2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. Requests in the first instance;

A. The Plaintiff’s main claim against Defendant B (i) is based on the premise that the Plaintiff is a substantial lessee under the lease agreement specified in Section II below, the Plaintiff filed a claim for refund of lease deposit, ② a claim for refund of necessary expenses, ③ a claim for return of beneficial expenses or a claim for attached things, ④ a claim for long-term repair appropriations, ⑤ a claim for damages equivalent to the cost of removal, ⑤ a claim for damages equivalent to the cost of repair due to a fall and

B. The Plaintiff filed a claim for damages equivalent to the cost of removal due to the fall short of the cost of removal, i.e., the Plaintiff filed a claim for the return of lease deposit, ii) the return of necessary cost, i.e. the return of profit cost or the purchase of accessories, i. the claim for long-term repair appropriations, ii) the claim for damages equivalent to the cost of removal, i.e. the claim for damages equivalent to the cost of removal due to falling short of

B. (1) On the premise that the Plaintiff is a substantial lessee under the above lease agreement, the Plaintiff filed a claim for damages for illegal acts due to the Defendant Company’s failure to perform its duty of maintenance, repair and management of boiler rooms and hot water supply rooms, and 4. The Defendant Company imposed general management expenses without any ground, thereby excessively collecting the management expenses.

D. The Plaintiff filed a claim for damages equivalent to the management expenses that the Defendant Company collected excessively by imposing general management expenses without any ground, on the boiler room and sugar room, in subrogation of D in order to preserve the claim against D, the lessee of the above lease contract.

C. Defendant B’s counterclaim claim is due to an illegal possession against the Plaintiff as a counterclaim.