근저당권말소등기
1.In accordance with the succession participation in the trial, the judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The plaintiff.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "D. The defendant succeeding intervenor completed the additional registration of the transfer of each of the instant collective security rights to the Cheongju District Court, No. 22149, Jun. 12, 2016, which was received on June 12, 2016, as Cheongju District Court, No. 22149, which was received on June 12, 2017, as to each of the instant collective security rights after acquiring the secured claim of each of the instant collective security rights from the defendant," and "No. 1 (including the provisional number)" in Part 16 of the second part, "No. 7 (including the provisional number)" are as follows; "the defendant" in Part 3 of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, with the exception of "the succeeding intervenor".
2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant succeeding intervenor is dismissed according to the defendant succeeding intervenor's succession participation in the trial court, and the decision of the court of first instance is modified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.