except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 15, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 09:00 on the 09:00, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, deducted the victim D (here, 82) who was waiting for a taxi in front of the bus stops C in front of the city bus stops, and used the victim's hand, such as the victim's hand, face, breast, and boom, by taking away the portable hand knick located in Aluminum, which is a dangerous object owned by the victim, on several occasions; and (b) assessed the victim's hand, face, breast, and boom part of the hand, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of each police statement regarding D;

1. A written diagnosis on D;

1. Investigation report (verification of field CCTV, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the counter investigation of shots E);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasoning of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: Defendant’s use of dangerous articles to assault an elderly victim, thereby creating a good quality of the crime, and the victim’s damage was not recovered.

O favorable circumstances: there is no criminal power against the defendant, and there is no emphasis on the degree of injury of the victim.

O In full view of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the punishment shall be determined as ordered.