교통사고처리특례법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of Category B passenger cars.
On March 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 2, 2015, and moved the front three-distance intersection from the old apartment to the old apartment.
The location was that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with a three-distance intersection has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by emphasizing the front, left, and right, and accurately manipulating the steering system, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected it, and received the left-hand side of the vehicle driving by the Defendant on the upper left-hand side of the front-hand part of the vehicle driving by the victim C (the 17-year-old) who is driving from the direction of the new leuk Elementary School (the 17-year-old).
As a result, the Defendant suffered knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee, which requires treatment for the victim by occupational negligence above, and at the same time damaged the Defendant’s repair cost of approximately KRW 468,00 on hand hand, etc. who the victim
2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution on this part is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag.