2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

A. The land research division of the Gyeonggi-gu FF Group, which was drafted during the Japanese colonial era, was registered as the land research division of the G at approximately 4,187 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”) on April 1, 1914 by the I having an address in G G G G H. (hereinafter “instant assessment land”).

B. Meanwhile, the entry of the land cadastre and the real estate register as to the area of 4,228 square meters prior to the Gyeonggi-gun E (hereinafter “instant land”) is as follows.

① Registration of ownership transfer as stated in paragraph (1) of the deceased J on May 18, 1965, ② Registration of ownership transfer as stated in paragraph (1) of the deceased J on May 18, 1973 ③ Registration of ownership transfer as stated in paragraph (1) of the claim on July 2, 1988, which was based on the inheritance due to a consultation or division as of November 23, 1984 ④ Registration of ownership transfer as stated in paragraph (2) of the preceding registration of ownership transfer as of September 30, 198, ⑤ Registration of ownership transfer as stated in paragraph (2) of the preceding registration of ownership transfer as of September 28, 198, ⑤ Registration of ownership transfer as of February 1, 2006, the defendant B, on February 1, 2006, entered in paragraph (2) of the claim that was based on inheritance due to a consultation or division as of August 4, 2005).

C. The Network K died on February 11, 2006, and accordingly Defendant C and A, the wife, jointly inherited the deceased’s property. D.

On the other hand, the plaintiff's Ma died on April 8, 1918, and the plaintiff's AL died on August 11, 1927 as his son's son's son's son's son's son died on his son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 4, 13-18, Gap evidence 23-1, 2-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the following: I (a) the assessment title of the land in question; (b) the assessment title; and

2) As to the Plaintiff’s evidence M (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s evidence”)

As the same person, at the time of the assessment of the land of this case, the Plaintiff was the owner of the increased portion of the land and acquired the land for the original purpose.

Therefore, it is true.