If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 60,000 won.

On November 29, 2012, the Defendant, even though there is no intention or ability to pay the taxi fee, concluded that the Defendant would take a taxi in front of the C-owned station located in Jinju-si, and would offer a taxi fee when the Defendant arrives at the destination after getting a passenger D from the C-owned station in front of the C-owned station located in Jinju-si, and that he would offer a taxi fee if the passenger arrives at the destination. On the same day, the Defendant, via G hotel located in the C-owned Office in Changwon-si, Changwon-dong and in the F of the South-Namnam-gun, would operate the taxi up to the front way of the F-owned Saemaul F-dong in Jinju-si

As a result, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to 253,360 won from the taxi fee by making a false statement to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;