except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a NAS car.

On March 13:11, 2013, the Defendant proceeded along the five-lane road in front of the reduction zone in the city where the city was in the city where the city was in the city where the city was in the city where the city was in the city where the city was in the city where the city was in the city where the city was in the city.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care for the driver of the motor vehicle to safely operate the motor vehicle according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the injury of the victim C(53 years old) who cross the crosswalk from the right side to the left side in accordance with the pedestrian signal by neglecting it, thereby taking the left part of the victim C(53 years old)'s driving, which cross the crosswalk from the right side, into the front part of the said car, and suffered the victim's injury to the left-hand pelle, which requires approximately 12 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (which reflects the fact that there is an agreement with the victim, etc.);