On June 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim E (the 56-year-old) (the 56-year-old) who was aware of the fact that he had asked the victim E (the 56-year-old) to put him at the house to the house; (b) but the victim refused the request, and (c) collected the tree chairs (the 40cm, the 40cm, the 40cm, the 40cm high, the 90cm high, the 90cm high) on the head of the victim, thereby getting off one time on the part of the victim’s head; (d) after saving the victim’s flabbbbbbbbbbbbbbing on his fla; and (e) by walking the right side of the victim one time, caused the victim’s injury, such as an open treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of amount is that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects it, and that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant is favorable.

However, considering the fact that the defendant can have a force of violence, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of during the period of probation, the method of the crime, the injury level, danger, etc., the crime of this case is disadvantageous to others.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of such circumstances and other various sentencing conditions as the defendant's age, health status, family environment, motive and background of the crime, degree of damage, and circumstances after the crime.