손해배상(자)
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and Eul evidence Nos. 4 through 7: (1) around January 19, 2012, Eul was sentenced to a stay of execution for 20 years on the ground that the plaintiff, who was crossinging the road, was damaged due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter "the accident of this case"), and the defendant was sentenced to a stay of execution for 20 years on July 5, 2012 on the ground that "the defendant caused the accident of this case by negligence going beyond the speed limit of 0,000,000,000 won, which is difficult to secure at the time," and that the defendant was sentenced to a stay of execution for 20 years on the crosswalk, which is the victim of this case, on the ground that the plaintiff was not the victim of this case, and the defendant was not the victim of this appeal under the circumstance of 20,000 square meters.
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for all damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case.
2. The limitation B, at the time of the instant accident, was milched with the surface at the time of the instant accident, and even if the view was not secured properly, it was not continuous operation, but rather operated at a speed exceeding 72 km per hour to continuously obtain green signal, and caused the instant accident to cause serious damage to the Plaintiff in the plant life.
On the other hand, however, during the night, he disregards the signal of the neighboring crosswalk by putting the clothes of the driver's eye that are not kept in the snow.