The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. Defendant A: (a) around June 29, 2013, the Defendant: (b) took advantage of the gaps in the E office operated by the victim D located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; and (c) took a theft with 26 mobile phone terminals of the city where the victim owned by the victim, who was located there.

2. Around June 2013, Defendant B received approximately KRW 2 million from the victim as described in paragraph (1) and embezzled the said mobile phone 24 units by arbitrarily disposing of the said mobile phone at around July 2013 while being entrusted with custody of R-3 mobile phone 24 units at the market price from the victim as described in paragraph (1) and kept for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of each police statement regarding D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a thief) Defendant B: Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of embezzlement);

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.