A violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act stated in this paragraph and judgment.

On February 1, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months and three years of suspension of execution for occupational embezzlement at the Suwon District Court on February 1, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 26, 2012.

Although the Defendant registered as a lawyer on February 20, 2007, on July 26, 2012, the Defendant lost his/her lawyer qualification by becoming final and conclusive imprisonment without labor or heavier punishment due to embezzlement.

[2013 Highest 557: Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act] Although the Defendant was disqualified as an attorney, the Defendant received a request from AE to conduct an investigation into the high-speed vehicle AF's high-ranking vehicle export suspicion in the vicinity of the police station in Ansan-gu during the period of Ansan-si around January 8, 2013, and completed a written appointment of counsel.

The Defendant visited the police station hearing held during the period immediately after all years, and presented the above attorney appointment document and the attorney identification card, and strongly asserted that AF’s search and investigation into AF’s AF’s defense counsel on January 8, 2013 was improper. From AF, the Defendant was transferred KRW 5 million to the Seoul Savings Bank account in the name of the Defendant, Seoul Savings Bank account at around 16:31, Jan. 8, 2013, and KRW 4 million around 19:38, 2013.

On January 16, 2013, from around 14:39 to 17:07, the Defendant continued to attend the first investigation process with respect to AF, which was conducted at a police station’s criminal record room and a statement recording room, as a counsel of AF, and submitted the above attorney’s appointment, a copy of the attorney’s identification card, and a written statement, and inspected and sealed the investigation after the completion of the investigation.

In addition, on January 21, 2013, from around 18:03 to 18:30 on January 21, 2013, the Defendant attended the second investigation process with AF’s defense counsel as well as the second investigation process with respect to AF taken place in the police station and the statement recording room during the inner period.

Accordingly, the defendant, not attorneys-at-law, dealt with legal affairs concerning investigation cases which are dealt with by investigation agencies.

[2013 Highest 1511] Victims.