When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 27, 2012, the Defendant was diagnosed by the above C from the 2nd floor of the Do Council members located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on September 27, 2012 that the Defendant was hospitalized in a medical institution in order to receive the insurance money after being diagnosed by the said C as the bed of the fingers and the bed of the fingers and the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the death.

However, there is no fact that Defendant A received hospitalized treatment, such as leaving a hospital and running a personal life at his own house.

In addition, the Defendant was hospitalized at D Council members from August 25, 2012 to September 10, 2012 in order to collect insurance money by increasing the number of days of hospitalization, and was issued with a false confirmation of hospitalization on the following day: (a) on September 11, 2012, the Defendant was hospitalized at D Council members from August 25, 2012 to September 10, 2012; and (b) on September 11, 2012, was hospitalized at D Hospital, and was hospitalized for 83 days at D Hospital; and

Accordingly, the Defendant, upon receipt of a written confirmation of discharge on the basis of false records of hospitalization, deceiving damage insurers by submitting it to two damage insurers, such as Korean Commercial Life Insurance Companies, and by receiving total 7,406,175 won from September 27, 2012 to May 15, 2013, such as the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A copy of each police suspect examination protocol of F, G, and H (Third);

1. A copy of each police statement made in relation to I, J,K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, T, U, and V;

1. Application of suspect insurance money analysis data, medical records, and statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order are actually the defendant.