If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 11:50 on November 25, 2013, the Defendant stated that “If the Defendant deposits KRW 180,000,000,000 in total, KRW 1,80,000,00,000,000,000, the Defendant would provide the victim B with the Defendant’s remaining photographic online advertising at a closed place, the Defendant would provide the victim B with the original photographic file, photographic file, photographic personal belongings, profes, and additional outdoor filming.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to provide the victim with photographs, dysaf products, additional outdoor photography.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 100,000 from the victim on November 25, 2013, and KRW 80,000 from March 22, 2014, and acquired KRW 180,000 from the victim to the foreign exchange bank account under the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of a police officer;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the specifications of transactions by account and the past trading records investigation;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;