2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3...

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle by borrowing the motor vehicle.

On June 2, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at around 13:15, and proceeded about four lanes near the king of Ulsannam-gu, Seoul-do along the two king distance with four lanes from the industrial tower. On June 2, 2013, the Defendant changed the course to three lanes.

At the same time, the three-lanes of the above road are in progress by the victim D (n, 37 years old), and in such a case, there is a concern that the person engaged in driving service may obstruct the normal passage of other vehicles running along the lane intended for the change, and the vehicle shall not change its course when there is a concern that the person engaged in driving service would interfere with the normal passage of the other vehicles, and the vehicle shall not be changed as part of the defendant's vehicle while driving the vehicle without any rescue measures despite the fact that the vehicle had a duty of care to safely change the lanes and prevent the accident due to the change of the vehicle's surrounding traffic situation, and due to the negligence of the defendant's failure to do so, while leaving the vehicle as the left part of the vehicle's right side of the vehicle driven by the victim F (46 years old) without any rescue measures.

The Defendant’s occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, such as knee’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. The F and D statements;

1. Each written diagnosis, each.