In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

According to the Public Official Election Act, no one, other than a candidate, his/her spouse, election campaign manager, chief of the election campaign liaison office, election campaign worker, assistant accompanying a candidate, and accountant in charge, shall conduct an election campaign using shoulder belts, hats, clothes with the same shape and color, labels, flags, props, props, and other marks during the election campaign period.

Defendants were volunteers of F Party G candidates who run for the nationwide constituency E-election of Do-Si, Dong-si, Do-Si, which was implemented on June 4, 2014, and were unable to carry out an election campaign by using props, etc., but the Defendants conspired to enter the date and time of the crime in the indictment in May 29, 2014 during the election campaign period (the commencement of May 22, 2014), but the prosecutor entered the date and time of the crime in the indictment as “F Party 24 May 24, 2014.” However, according to Articles 3-6, 9-14 of the evidence record, this appears to be an obvious clerical error, and the date and time of the crime

(The Defendant stated at an investigative agency that the date and time of the instant crime was May 24, 2014. However, this appears to have been a statement due to mistake in the process of being investigated only once a month since the date of the instant crime. At around 16:30, the Defendant carried out an election campaign by carrying out an election campaign using props by carrying out a copy of the expansion of ballot papers (a4 paper size) indicating the candidates in front of the H community self-governing center, and filing an appeal for support for the above candidates with many and unspecified residents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made by the Defendants in this Act

1. Statement of statement concerning I prepared by the police officer;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. Entry of investigation intelligence reports prepared by the police;

1. Each image of a field photograph (Evidence No. 15-18 of the evidence);

1. The Defendants and their defense counsel regarding the assertion of two copies of the expansion of the ballot papers (Evidence No. 7, No. 8) used as a small product and their defense counsel. Since the Defendants committed the instant crime due to the legal sites, the Defendants committed the instant crime. Accordingly, the Defendants committed the instant crime.