2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s confessions all the charges and reflects on the facts charged.

However, considering all kinds of sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the remaining amount of damage not recovered exceeds 46 million won, the defendant repeated the crime even though he had the record of punishment such as punishment for the same kind of crime, and the circumstances and results of the crime in this case, etc., the court below's punishment is too too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.