사해행위취소
1. The part of the plaintiff's selective claim added in the trial shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's appeal and the trial court.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is that part of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows: “Plaintiff A” among the judgment of the first instance court is as “Plaintiff B”; “Plaintiff B” as “Plaintiff B; “Successor B” as “the succeeding intervenor at the first instance court”; “the Act on the Utilization and Management of Real Estate” as “the National Land Planning and Utilization Act 19, 20 [Attachment 8] 5] ; “No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance” as “No. 7 of the same case’s 1st instance court’s “No. 1”; “No. 3 of the instant agreement” as “the first instance court’s “No. 7 of the instant case’s “No. 1”; “No. 4 of the instant judgment” as “the first instance court’s “No. 7 of the instant case’s “No. 1”; and No. 1 of the instant list No. 75 and No. 6 and No. 7 of the Plaintiff’s “No. 17 of the instant agreement” as “No. 1”